Court Grants Paid Maternity Leave to Commissioning Parent in Surrogacy Agreement as far back as 2011

Court Grants Paid Maternity Leave to Commissioning Parent in Surrogacy Agreement as far back as 2011

Court Grants Paid Maternity Leave to Commissioning Parent in Surrogacy Agreement as far back as 2011

Article by John Botha

The Labour Court as far back as 2011 that a commissioning parent in a surrogacy agreement is entitled to paid maternity leave, marking a significant step forward in recognizing diverse family structures and parental rights.

The case (Case Number: D 312/2012) involved an employee of the State Information Technology Agency (Pty) Ltd who, along with his spouse, had entered into a surrogacy agreement. When the employee applied for four months of paid maternity leave upon the birth of their child, the employer initially refused, offering only family responsibility leave or unpaid leave.

The applicant argued that the refusal constituted unfair discrimination based on gender, sex, family responsibility, and sexual orientation. As a commissioning parent, the applicant planned to take on the role typically performed by the birth mother, highlighting the need for policies to adapt to modern family dynamics.

In its analysis, the court emphasized that maternity leave should primarily consider the child's best interests, not just the mother's health. Referencing the Constitution's Bill of Rights and the Children's Act, the court found no justification for denying the applicant the same duration of maternity leave as a natural mother.

The judgment declared the employer's refusal of paid maternity leave as unfair discrimination and ordered the following:

1. Recognition of Civil Union status in applying maternity leave policies

2. Non-discrimination against commissioning parents in surrogacy agreements

3. Payment of two months' salary to the applicant

4. Coverage of the applicant's legal costs

This ruling aligned with the recent van Wyk judgement and calls on employers to update their policies to reflect case law, civil unions and surrogacy agreements. It challenges traditional notions of parenthood and emphasizes the importance of adapting workplace policies to support diverse family structures.

As society continues to evolve, this case serves as a reminder that the law must keep pace with changing family dynamics to ensure equality and fairness for all parents, regardless of how they come to parenthood.

Latest News